Skip to main content

Creative Control: Good or Bad?

As you've probably heard if you follow such things, British director Edgar Wright is out as helmer of next year's Marvel movie Antman. If rumors are to be believed, Marvel had a problem with some aspect of the script and Wright wouldn't change it. Supposedly the production is still on schedule. We'll see. 

This production was doomed from the start but not for reasons you'll probably catch around the 'net. First Wright wanted to go with Antman #2 Scott Lang instead of Hank Pym. Say what? To me, and I know I'm probably in the minority, he's way more interesting than Lang. (At least for the first movie...) Lang stole Pym's suit to save his daughter from criminals. (Did I mention she's also dying?) To me, it's like going with Guy Gardiner instead of Hal Jordan for Green Lantern... Anyway, Pym is an arrogant scientist (basically an alcoholic version of Big Bang Theory's Sheldon)  who figured out how to make things shrink and grow.  His love interest is socialite Janet Van Dyne; basically more Penny than Amy, if we continue the BBT analogy, also known as Wasp. (Janet would've been the Lang's love interest in the movie 'cause that makes sense...)

Marvel has liked strict control over their properties even before they started making their own movies. True story: She-Hulk was created so the Incredible Hulk TV showrunners wouldn't capitalize on the "success" of The Bionic Woman and create their own version!

In the comics, Antman and Wasp were Avengers before Captain America and the soon to be added Scarlet Witch and Quicksilver yet they're pushed off into Phase 3 of Marvel's cinematic multi-year plan? What the hell is that? It's Big Bang Theory with super powers!  Hank is Sheldon, Tony "Ironman" Stark is Howard, and Bruce "Hulk" Banner is a combo of Leonard and Raj.

Anyway, this got me thinking about if creative control is a good or bad thing. Back in the day at least, Star Trek novels were more controled creatively than Star Wars novels.  Author Barbara Hambly wrote the Trek novel Crossroad where this tentacled black monster from another dimension took over the Enterprise.  It sucked. She then wrote the Star Wars novels Children of the Jedi and Planet of Twilight which were fantastic. On the other hand, Vonda McIntyre's novelization of Star Trek III: The Search for Spock was damn good but her novel written for the "other universe", The Crystal Star, was boring as hell.

To sum up: Some writers need to be reigned in while others chafe too much and still don't follow instruction.  The trick for Marvel will always be finding that right balance.                  

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

When Captain America Throws His Mighty Shield...

As I was recently discussing with someone on Twitter, I'm not a big fan of "Good Guys Manipulated Fight Each Other" films so it's sad that Captain America: Civil War came out so close on the heels of Batman v. Superman. As maybe I've confessed before I am more of a Marvel fan but that is not why this one was better.  DC fans frequently point out this was the 13th Marvel film while BvS  is only the second of their new cinematic universe. To me, that's why it worked better. The tension was building out of the last Avengers  movie and the characters have interacted for several movies worth of time (One must assume interactions happen off screen as well) so they know each other pretty well. Two friends having a disagreement carries so much more weight than two strangers going at it. 

In my critique of  Batman v. Superman,  I noted that the end of the featured fight hinged on the fact both characters' mothers were named Martha. Here, the big fight ended when …

Strange Times

No, this isn't about the election. I'm not ready to unlease that upon the world just yet.  Instead, allow me to share my thoughts on another fantastic entry into Marvel's cinematic universe.  Doctor Strange was the perfect blend of the tone we are used to and the adding of the supernatural world.

Friends on Facebook may have noticed my comment that the first part of  The Imitation Game  was unexpectedly hilarious due in large part to Benedict Cumberbatch's turn as Alan Turing so it comes as no surprise he's awesome as arrogant neurosurgeon (a redundant phrase in my personal experience.)

Doctor Strange, like Ghost Rider, is really not a character that lends itself to having a love interest but since it's an origin story, it worked here with  fellow surgeon Dr. Christine Palmer. Certainly better than in that movie... I've loved Rachel McAdams since The Family Stone  but I'm sure the character'll just go the route of Thor's Jane Foster and just be …

An X-Cellent Post

 X-Men: Apocalypse is the third of the "prequel movies" and today is my second favorite after First Class.  Don't get me wrong: the last one,  Days of Future Past,was far from terrible but you could easily argue it was an excuse to feature Hugh Jackman. The other two do just fine with cameos (which are both awesome and unnecessary but I digress...)

The two biggest complaints I've had about the franchise are the lack of even internal continuity and lack of effort. This movie clearly had the attitude they know continuity is messed up and they don't give a shit. Havok and Cyclops are brothers but inexplicably 20 years apart in age but certainly don't look it. In '83, Prof. Xavier sees CIA Moira McTaggart for the first time since the Cuban Missile Crisis and comments, "You haven't aged a day!" Not even James Bond is a field agent in his late '50's but whatever... (Speaking of Moira,  Rose Byrne is Tasmanian while the character is Scottis…