Skip to main content

Classic Example of Nerd vs. Average Viewer?

Saw Batman v. Superman this weekend. Overall, I really enjoyed it. Seeing Superman, Batman AND Wonder Woman on screen made me squee with as much delight as seeing Avengers the first time, as it should.

Man of Steel for me was both the best Superman movie and worst Superman movie. Director  Zack Snyder still admits he finds the character boring.  In that movie, Superman is inexperienced as superhero and consequently, there's more death and destruction  then we're used to.

Batman's mistrust of the Kryptonian in Batman v. Superman comes from this. Also, the film reminds you, Bruce seemingly hasn't let go of the anger over failing to stop the death of his parents as a child. (The movie hints that the events happen sometime after the death of Robin #2 Jason Todd at the hands of the Joker. No Robins are specifically mentioned so we have no idea how many this version of Batman had. Those readers who don't know anything about Batman after the '66 TV series are probably lost right now.)

Whether this was the plan all along or a response to fan reaction of Man of Steel, we will never know but Superman does experience growth which is awesome. I was worried that Batman would be overtly shoehorned into this continuation of his origin but he's just there.  (One could argue the meeting created growth opportunities for both characters...)

Jesse Eisenberg was too much like The Riddler or the Flash villain, The Trickster for my tastes but his machinations to get the title fight to happen was the purest Lutor plot ever seen in a movie. Sink California? A Kryptonite Island? Come on...   

Typically, "universe-building films," see Ironman 2 and Amazing Spider-man 2, are highly criticized for not spending too much time building future movies and not enough time shaping the the current film. Since this is the third such time, I think DC and Warner Brothers executives benefited from seeing what doesn't really work. The brief cameos of Aquaman, Flash and Cyborg were well done.

Wonder Woman, on the other hand, was in more of the movie making it obvious she was under-used. It's never made clear why she's snooping around Luthor's estate. Fans such as myself who know details of her upcoming, long-awaited,  solo film can surmise she's on the hunt for a mythical artifact but how others would know this, I have no idea.

A less well-known character Luthor's assistant, Mercy Graves, was also painfully under-used.  I had considered that maybe she could have caught Diana snooping and they could fight but there's problems here. The average viewer doesn't know who Diana is at this point in the film and the movie ends with no one, not two but three fight scenes in a row.

Superman had to fight Batman or Luthor would have his mother killed. Batman was in a pissy mood and would not listen to reason.  It wasn't until Superman gasped "Save Martha!" that there was any hesitation on his part. Both heroes have mothers named Martha.  It was ointed out to me that this fact wasn't what got Bruce to stop. it was that Clark had a mother which makes him human as opposed to a monster. I agree with this but it was the name that broke through. (With Lois running in to translate mind you...) I don't think Bruce would have yielded otherwise.

Fight number two was Batman rescuing Martha Kent (Diane Lane) from KGBeast and other Russian thugs. This was perhaps the least necessary fight scene but the one I enjoyed the most.  Trivia: Lane's ex-husband Josh Brolin was considered for the role of Batman. I wonder how the scene would have played out then?

Fight three was Superman, Batman AND Wonder Woman fighting  Luthor's  Kryptonian monstrosity Doomsday. I waffle back and forth which fight scene is least necessary. I like the title fight the least but this last one has only one merit: You see Wonder Woman in action. Bruce does find a picture of her in costume from 1918 earlier in he film. Maybe that's enough as far as universe building is concerned?  Wonder Woman could show up at the end and lasso Luthor before he can throw the switch? ::shrugs::       

In short, the movie isn't nearly as bad as the number of bad reviews would have you believe but is far from perfect...

         

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

When Captain America Throws His Mighty Shield...

As I was recently discussing with someone on Twitter, I'm not a big fan of "Good Guys Manipulated Fight Each Other" films so it's sad that Captain America: Civil War came out so close on the heels of Batman v. Superman. As maybe I've confessed before I am more of a Marvel fan but that is not why this one was better.  DC fans frequently point out this was the 13th Marvel film while BvS  is only the second of their new cinematic universe. To me, that's why it worked better. The tension was building out of the last Avengers  movie and the characters have interacted for several movies worth of time (One must assume interactions happen off screen as well) so they know each other pretty well. Two friends having a disagreement carries so much more weight than two strangers going at it. 

In my critique of  Batman v. Superman,  I noted that the end of the featured fight hinged on the fact both characters' mothers were named Martha. Here, the big fight ended when …

Strange Times

No, this isn't about the election. I'm not ready to unlease that upon the world just yet.  Instead, allow me to share my thoughts on another fantastic entry into Marvel's cinematic universe.  Doctor Strange was the perfect blend of the tone we are used to and the adding of the supernatural world.

Friends on Facebook may have noticed my comment that the first part of  The Imitation Game  was unexpectedly hilarious due in large part to Benedict Cumberbatch's turn as Alan Turing so it comes as no surprise he's awesome as arrogant neurosurgeon (a redundant phrase in my personal experience.)

Doctor Strange, like Ghost Rider, is really not a character that lends itself to having a love interest but since it's an origin story, it worked here with  fellow surgeon Dr. Christine Palmer. Certainly better than in that movie... I've loved Rachel McAdams since The Family Stone  but I'm sure the character'll just go the route of Thor's Jane Foster and just be …

An X-Cellent Post

 X-Men: Apocalypse is the third of the "prequel movies" and today is my second favorite after First Class.  Don't get me wrong: the last one,  Days of Future Past,was far from terrible but you could easily argue it was an excuse to feature Hugh Jackman. The other two do just fine with cameos (which are both awesome and unnecessary but I digress...)

The two biggest complaints I've had about the franchise are the lack of even internal continuity and lack of effort. This movie clearly had the attitude they know continuity is messed up and they don't give a shit. Havok and Cyclops are brothers but inexplicably 20 years apart in age but certainly don't look it. In '83, Prof. Xavier sees CIA Moira McTaggart for the first time since the Cuban Missile Crisis and comments, "You haven't aged a day!" Not even James Bond is a field agent in his late '50's but whatever... (Speaking of Moira,  Rose Byrne is Tasmanian while the character is Scottis…